Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kandi Barbour (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No deletion reason. Content dispute should be raised at the forums listed below. NACR#4 WP:SKCRIT 2(d) Procedural Closure (non-admin closure) Quek157 (talk) 18:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kandi Barbour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

Kandi Barbour[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claimed to be "hopeless lack of reliable sourcing, serious potential for thrid-party BLP violations and general inaccuracy" by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk · contribs) - John B123 (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - what's the deletion reason then? I only see content dispute there, content disputes cannot be brought to Afd, should be resolved over talkpage and some reverts which are close to 3RR --Quek157 (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominated for deletion to prevent Hullaballoo Wolfowitz repeatedly removing the page content without prior discussion for the reasons given above. John B123 (talk) 18:09, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is never never a deletion reason, there are Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring to go to and talk page. Closing as WP:SKCRIT 2(d) --Quek157 (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.