Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamla Kant Pandey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kamla Kant Pandey[edit]

Kamla Kant Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsupported. Only one external link, that is also dead. Talk about some miracle technology of gene transfer that has revolutionized the science but he probably missed the Nobel prize for this discovery! Educationtemple (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Citation record is borderline for WP:PROF#C1. Fellowship in the Linnean society is, judging from their web site, not a significant honor. This could go either way for me but what turns me against it is the lack of sources in the article and my inability to find sources that cover the subject in nontrivial detail. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nothing showing up to make him notable in NZ NealeFamily (talk) 01:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.