Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamilla Hermann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kamilla Hermann[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The notability of this person is not substantiated, and the tone of the article is quite unambiguously promotional (self-promotional?). Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 14:37, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Hungary. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources aren't really sources, not independent, not reliable, just bio listing types. No indication of notability, just another corporate cog. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, it looks like much of the content is unsourced (ie education and professional activity). Coolcactus04 (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but purge Seems to be notable per Forbes list of wealthy, we should drop the article down to bare minimum, and engage someone who can contribute from the hungarian language community, Sadads (talk) 14:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People who appear on these Forbes rich lists are often notable, but ultimately we need significant coverage in independent reliable sources to clear the notability threshold—not just a mere mention in a list. I've done a fair bit of searching (including for "Hermann Kamilla", which is the standard order under Hungarian naming conventions), and there doesn't seem to be any GNG-qualifying sourcing: I found a few passing mentions in the press, non-independent sources, and the like, but no reliable sources seem to discuss her in any depth. Her company hu:Indotek Group may well deserve an article, and if such an article is written Hermann might merit a mention in it, but she does not seem to be sufficiently notable for an article of her own. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Came across the article in the new page feed, there is some interesting elements that can help towards GNG. But I really don't see enough. Agree that the page is very promotional, puffy, there are other sources online, but I really don't see enough to qualify for an article at present. Govvy (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.