Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamalendu Chakraborty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kamalendu Chakraborty[edit]
- Kamalendu Chakraborty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
With greatest respect to Dr Chakraborty, this article would appear to fail WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO Shirt58 (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I could not find evidence that this doctor meets WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. BTW based on his facebook page he seems to prefer the spelling Kamalendu Chakrabarti; I also found Chakrabarty at Google Scholar. --MelanieN (talk) 15:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not seeing sufficient sourcing to rise to SCHOLAR or BASIC either, under either spelling. --joe deckertalk to me 04:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.