Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamal Khangura

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 19:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamal Khangura[edit]

Kamal Khangura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability due to lack of independent reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:NACTOR/NMODEL. GSS💬 06:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS💬 06:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GSS💬 06:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS💬 06:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep See the references. I think these are enough for notebility. Note to closing admin: Virenderthind2019 (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
You need to look at sources yourself along with WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS. None of the sources you cited discusses the subject in detail, they're all passing mention (not significant coverage) and most of them are not even reliable. GSS💬 02:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Check 1st and 2nd refs. on the Article. Are those not reliable? 3rd and 4th are Interview on youtube. and some of refs are secondary reliable sources.

Virenderthind2019 (talk) 03:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghaintpunjab is not an reliable source and interviews are not considered independent reliable sources. GSS💬 03:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But PTC News is reliable source. and What about 7th, 8th and 9th? These are secondary reliable sources.

Virenderthind2019 (talk) 04:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PTC is a pr piece which does not establish notability and rest of them are all passing mentions. GSS💬 04:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So you should check this article Aman Hundal. Articles is still published since 2016.

Virenderthind2019 (talk) 16:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You better read other stuff exists. GSS💬 16:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please explain in your words?

Virenderthind2019 (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per GSS. All references except the PTC article, which is a press release, are passing mentions or completely unreliable sources like Youtube videos. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I found nothing except WP:ROUTINE. Fails WP:NACTOR. KartikeyaS (talk) 16:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.