Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalyanasundara Sastrigal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 17:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kalyanasundara Sastrigal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In its current form, subject doesn't seem to have passed WP:GNG. Google couldn't return something promising too. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My research shows that while his name appears as editor on several apparently important books on the Gita and Upanishads, the Vedanta, etc. I could not find any reliable substantive independent sources that discussed him specifically. Retaining an article like this would typically require that at least one such source be identified and that it be connected to and support at least one statement in the article. I was not able to do this. KDS4444^Talk 13:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 16:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.