Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaltiecoatia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kaltiecoatia[edit]

Content duplicated from Cymothoa exigua. No Google hits for "Kaltiecoatia", "Kaltie coatia", or any similar spacing permutation. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. —Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE, if nothing can be found to verify its existance.--Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 22:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why not speedy or redirect?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crusio (talk • contribs) 19:26, 29 December 2008
- Hoaxes should only be speedied when they consist of "blatant misinformation"; sometimes, information corroborating the veracity of a suspected hoax can surface during AfD. Redirect to what, exactly? :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as probable hoax. GlassCobra 02:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I wrote a poem about how this article was written. I call it "How that hoax article was written." Copy / paste / find-and-replace. The end. flaming lawye r^c 05:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hoax. Personally, I would have redirected it to Cymothoa exigua and then proposed it for speedy as an unlikely redirect... :-) --Crusio (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probably a hoax, and anyway no need to keep it; it's just a copy-paste from another article. Chamal ^talk 09:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.