Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalpasa Ankita Shaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kalpasa Ankita Shaw[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, search finds nothing beyond the usual social media and gossip pieces, no RS and certainly no sigcov. I would have requested speedy, but those minor beauty pageant wins probably amount to a claim of noteworthiness, so opted for AfD instead. Fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I almost nominated this one myself, but I wanted to see how others handled it. For me, it seemed like a gray area between A7/draftify/AFD. It is sourced, and the sources are completely about her so it's on its way to significant coverage. However I am left uncomfortable with 1) possible lack of independence of the pieces (could be advertorials), 2) possibility that these aren't respected WP:NEWSORGS but are instead just blogs, especially odialive.com, and 3) the WP:NOTGOSSIP nature of the pieces. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per nom and Novem Linguae Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 10:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:BIO. Agree with others about the WP:NOTGOSSIP nature of the pieces. The mentioned beauty pageants are themself non notable. defcon5 (talk) 07:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete her level of beauty pageant winning does not make her default notable, and we do not have substantial enough sources to justify a biography otherwise.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I would have prefer CSD. Sonofstar (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.