Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaleen Plaza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kaleen Plaza[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small WP:ROTM shopping center with 1 anchor grocery store and about a dozen small stores. Refs are some routine local coverage. Does not meet GNG. Shopping malls with articles typically have multiple anchors and 50, 100, or more stores and have significant community or regional impact. MB 02:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. MB 02:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MB 02:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing suggests this passes WP:NORG or WP:NGEO, coverage is limited to press releases and their rewrites (business-as-usual). However, I'd encourage closing admin (if this is to be deleted) to take a minute and add an entry to the wv:Canberra (just copy paste text to a new listing in the Buy section there). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, so a "redirect" to Kaleen (and maybe listing it under a renamed (from Churches and schools to "Facilities") section is out of the question? Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how listing it in Kaleen is appropriate. If we commonly listed non-notable shopping centers in articles on places, a big city could have hundreds. WP is not a directory of trivia. If there were a case that this shopping center is particularly significant to Kaleen and aided the understanding of that topic, a case could be made. That is a discussion for the talk page there. MB 14:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

although, as a gazetteer, readers may expect to see general (not necessarily standalone notable), information about locations within it? Coolabahapple (talk) 07:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Kaleen. The content has reliable sources but is not notable enough for its own article. Merging and redirecting means it can easily form part of the article for the suburb. Bookscale (talk) 11:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable. WP:ROTM shopping center with only routine coverage. Acnetj (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.