Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaki West

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kaki West[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent evidence of notability. The roles are trivial, and there's essentially nothing else DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bing_West#Personal_life rather than deleting in case she ever does make it big. Google News found some foreign results here and here but they are hardly sufficient as there are more photos and less actual info. Another Google News search provided a blog which is also hardly sufficient. Basically, she doesn't have much on her resume and thus not much to build a good article, actress or model. Apparently, she posed in Esquire but the only links supporting this are a video and blogs. SwisterTwister talk 01:25, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A Redirect here on the basis "in case she ever does make it big" would justify a redirect for every child of even a moderately notable person. It would also encourage the entirely irrelevant addition of information about all their childrens' careers in the article on their parents. DGG ( talk ) 21:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:00, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think the redirect is a good idea. The article fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. She is a very minor actress, single scene, single episodes and not really done much else. The Bing West has a single small sentence about her with a link to this article. Keep it, but remove the link. scope_creep talk 14:52 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Delete Once I removed the IMDB reference there isn't enough content to pass WP:NMODEL. Hasteur (talk) 15:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.