Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kailash Chandra Mishra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kailash Chandra Mishra[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is blatantly promotional/"about me"-like (and judging from the talk page, has been so for a very long time), it's a list of the things he's done but does nothing to establish notability. No inline sources, and only one external link is even third-party coverage of the subject (the rest are by him or lists of his work). Didn't find any reliable sources on my own to establish notability. creffett (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Inadequate sourcing. Reads like PROMO. If someone manages to establish notability, please feel free to ping me to reconsider.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks very promotional, something that is against what Wikipedia is per WP:NOTPROMO. His citations are very bad [1], which doesn't make it a pass on WP:PROF's side. The best source I could find on him is [2], so he fails WP:GNG as well. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:09, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.