Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kagitham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kagitham[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any source on this. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as zero mention to its existance anywhere. If assuming good faith, it may be a spelling mistake but even then I can't imagine what else it could be. Can't find even the faintest mention anywhere. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist¹ 1 ¹ 21:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 19:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as apparent hoax. CJK09 (talk) 19:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.