Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadodiya solar park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kadodiya solar park[edit]

Kadodiya solar park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about a solar plant. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 15:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleteas meagerly sourced commercial spam. The nominator could have prodded first. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  • Leaning delete - not finding any coverage in reliable sources. However, Indian-language sources may be available, hence the "leaning" nature of the !vote. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Could not find evidence of notability. ~KvnG 00:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.