Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadhal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Wikipedia does include articles for notable names. A (thin) case could be made that this article asserts its notability, but without sources (and with only a highly eclectic list as text-body) the current content runs afoul of WP:NOT, as well as WP:V. The consensus here is clear and in accord with policy. Xoloz 02:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Kadhal

Simply the meaning of a word. No useful information. -Cribananda 20:57, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete foreign dicdef meets randomlistcruft. --eivind^t@c 22:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as listcruft and dicdef. M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 22:45, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 22:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing useful in this plain dicdef. Phaedriel ♥ tell me - 00:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete.Bharatveer 03:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Mild keep. Apparently WP does names: Category:Given names. Compare with Gertrude. Have catted and stubbified, so the Q is not, Is this stub informative, but Would an article with this title be a keeper. Cheers, JackyR | Talk 15:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. And, erm, Eivind, "foreign" to you mate. Not foreign to 600 million Indians... JackyR | Talk 15:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Huh? Where did you come up with 600 million anyway? That's neither the number of Indians nor the number of Tamilians. Btw, whoever told you Kadhal was a given name? Cribananda 22:56, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.