Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadambari Jethwani

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Per consensus from established editors. Star Mississippi 00:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kadambari Jethwani[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Kadambari Jethwani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress/ doctor/ chess champion. Appears to be full of fluff, and the only reference from a reliable source I can find about her is this - [1] which is an interview. Fails WP:GNG. Jupitus Smart 13:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*keep with 5 released movies most in lead roles , my opinion is the subject is notable. The page does need editing . 2405:204:94:4D2A:0:0:D35:C0A4 (talk) 11:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC). Blocked. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep needs editing . There are citations on the web, which haven’t been added in the references , need to be added . 5 released movies as main actress , also produced 1 Gujarati movie 2g apartments. 103.178.145.48 (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC) — 103.178.145.48 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. .[reply]
  • Keep the subject went by another screen name - Kahkkashan Aryan previously. News & articles on Google under that name too . 5 released movies . Physician, published in US medical journals. The article does require a tremendous amount of clean-up , but the subject, in my humble opinion, is notable 103.178.145.20 (talk) 04:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC) — 103.178.145.20 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
    Struck duplicate !vote, since the same IP has already voted above. CycloneYoris talk! 09:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • KeepThere are in depth articles in Times of India & also Indian Express , along with name citation as physician author in Cureus & Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives- PubMed Central - National Library of Mesicine , US . I would humbly vote for this article’s subject for notability . 103.178.145.48 (talk) 06:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC) — 103.178.145.48 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Per Rosguill and Oaktree b's assessment above, there is not sufficient high-quality independent SIGCOV coverage in RS that would give GNG. The refs presented by the IPs (or the one IP socking) are not suitable for GNG. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (edit conflict), as I see no evidence that this individual meets GNG or NACTOR, and no other criterion credibly applies: there are also serious promotion and BLP concerns. The medical publications don't count toward anything, as they are not independent. All the coverage in news sources is either non-substantive or non-independent. Many of the "keep" opinions are not based in policy, and should be discounted by the closer. I attempted to clean up the unsourced puffery, but gave it up as a lost cause; even if this person were notable, I would advocate for WP:TNT, as instead of a well-sourced stub, we have badly sourced puff-piece that violates BLP even if the content is all favorable. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The subject deserves the stub ! 2409:40C0:103F:E266:A997:1825:E311:E2A0 (talk) 18:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    like the stub in the 2 languages other than English .
    Deletion would be extreme & unwarranted . 2409:40C0:103F:E266:A997:1825:E311:E2A0 (talk) 18:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it should also be WP:SALTed. Aszx5000 (talk) 18:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete by WP:TOI: there is consensus that Times of India accepts money in exchange for positive coverage. The "newsroompost" article comes from a blog. The newindianexpress, indiaglitz article have a one sentence mention of her acting/modeling career. I could not find other media coverage of her. 2001:48F8:3004:FC4:48EA:35CE:A536:B342 (talk) 19:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kadambari_Jethwani&oldid=1158907765"