Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kačulice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep – per consensus and nomination withdrawn. (Non-admin closure) Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kačulice[edit]

The subject seems non-notable because I could not find any reliable sources in English, and the subject's only "claim to fame" seems like a very minor incident. Samuel Tan 02:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Places "Cities and villages are acceptable, regardless of size"; place exists [1]. JJL (talk) 02:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 04:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All towns are notable. I added some information that appears in the French Wikipedia. References for the alleged scandal would be helpful. --Eastmain (talk) 04:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - I'm the nominator; thanks for the info that towns are notable. --Samuel Tan 04:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.