Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSquirrel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KSquirrel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There's an article in Polish PC World magazine on it here (I've linked to the google translation). Also this Vietnamese page: [1], translation: [2]. Download page at PC World Canada: [3]. Download and description at PC Welt: [4], translation: [5]. TecChannel.de: [6] --JN 466 18:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. I'm not sure about the current coverage, or if it really meets the definition of "non-trivial" since they are effectively curt download pages. My feelings on the matter are... ambivalent I guess on this one. JBsupreme (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — æk ^Talk 02:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.