Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSEX (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 16:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KSEX[edit]

KSEX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not show notoriety, WP:NCORP. Weakly referenced. Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 13:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 13:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as no evidence of notability, fails & GNG/ –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No reliable references offered. Not much independent RS coverage found in search, just a trade article about the station's demise. Fails WP:CORP, WP:NMEDIA and WP:NWEB. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Internet radio streams do not get an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NMEDIA just for existing, but there's no evidence of the kind of reliable source coverage it would take to actually make it notable. Bearcat (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.