Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KQDF-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KQDF-LD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New Mexico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. This was actually one that I myself slid in some extra sources in back when the whole HC2 mass destruction thing was happening. Still think it deserves to stay kinda. Danubeball (talk) 20:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.: Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. The only sources are press releases and FCC reports, which are not secondary coverage. Let'srun (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.: Its road to becoming another run-of-the-mill DTV America/HC2/Innovate station seems to have only involved other full-time national services, most significantly being another run-of-the-mill Una Vez Más Azteca America station. That's nominally more history than many other DTV America/HC2/Innovate stations, but it doesn't generally lead to much more significant coverage or the need to maintain anything more than an {{R to list entry}}. A remnant of the looser standards of 2006, and another nominal survivor of the bulk nomination of many HC2/Innovate station articles from last year. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.