Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPDC-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. There was no support for redirecting to any other article. ✗plicit 01:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KPDC-LP[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG; some sources are questionable. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Christianity, and California. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the station served a sizable portion of the Christian community and appeared in multiple Christian publications. Karl Twist (talk) 06:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the refs in the article are SIGCOV. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin. I ask please that if it comes to the stage where this may be deleted, we could look at the alternative of redirecting it to Channel 25 low-power TV stations in the United States or create another page such as Channel 25 low-power TV stations in California or similar, thus preserving the history. I've also noticed that KSPK-LD, KBRO-LD and KJCS-LD are up for Deletion Nomination. Could we please look at doing similar for those. Perhaps redirect to Channel 25 low-power TV stations in the United States or create Low-power TV stations in Colorado. It would be a shame as there was work put into them by others and a redirect and merge is always a good alternative consideration. Thanks Karl Twist (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karl Twist, just offer an opinion to REDIRECT and your opinion will be considered, you do not have to make a plea to the closer. Just voice your argument as a regular discussion participant. And if you want this article or others Merged, you or another editor will need to create the target article yourself. It's not part of a closer's job tasks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Hi Liz, I wasn't actually expecting the closer to do so but I take your point. I was throwing a suggestion out there incase someone had an idea to create a target to redirect to. Karl Twist (talk) 11:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's fair to say that if Sammi Brie can't find any significant coverage for a broadcast station, it probably doesn't exist. (Certainly, among the existing sources, they are either listings, briefer mentions, non-independent, aren't necessarily about the station to start with, or some combination thereof.) I do concur with Karl Twist's suggestion that redirecting to lists are a valid alternative to deletion when available (and have accordingly !voted to that effect in most of the applicable recent AfDs), but our lists of low-power stations television stations tend to only include currently-licensed stations, so there's no such alternative for KPDC. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Hi, well possibly a consideration to re-direct to Channel 25 low-power TV stations in the United States could be floated. I can see merit in that. And a small caption beside it would be sufficient maybe. Karl Twist (talk) 11:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A discussion of possible redirect targets would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 10:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 00:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.