Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KM. Annamalai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 03:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KM. Annamalai[edit]

KM. Annamalai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In general fails WP:BASIC, WP:NPROF. No WP:SIGCOV to establish nobility. RationalPuff (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I don't even know what notability criterion this guy is supposed to meet. Certainly not NPROF, as he's not a professor, and I couldn't find any publications by him in Scopus so NACADEMIC also fails. Seems extremely non-notable. JoelleJay (talk) 06:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.