Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KLM Flight 1673

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 17:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KLM Flight 1673[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:AIRCRASH for a standalone article. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. No WP:PERSISTENCE ...William 15:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William 15:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions....William 15:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William 15:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:AIRCRASH: The accident involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Per The Bushranger, it does in fact meet WP:AIRCRASH, but the nom's point about WP:PERSISTENCE is also valid. Leaning keep because I favor specific guides over general ones. - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 17:59, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the bird strike article's incidents section. I don't think this warrants an article of its own, but would be a good addition to the bird strike article, which at the moment has a lot of minor incidents mentioned without sources to back them. YSSYguy (talk) 07:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 05:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to bird strike, per YSSYguy, based on WP:MILL. While the loss of the aircraft is certainly regrettable, there are many crashes of aircraft with total loss of the airplane. How does this one stand out from the others?Marikafragen (talk) 01:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. We are not a collection of news reports about transportation incidents. Sandstein 06:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.