Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDEN TV Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It would be a good idea to relist each individually. Majorly (Talk) 22:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KDEN TV Tower[edit]

As cleanup following successful batch deletion of unremarkable masts, I'm nominating a whole bunch of US radio and TV towers that are below than that 360 meters tall. Towers below 400m are relatively common in the USA, and none of the towers that I am nominating are notable in any way whatsoever, as far as I can tell. None of these articles have any substantial additional information other than their name, location and height. Ohconfucius 10:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 10:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. MER-C 10:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. --Hooperbloob 14:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom Akihabara 14:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 21:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. SkierRMH 07:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CHCH Television Tower - was tallest Canadian structure on completion, and the notability within Canada and the Commonwealth was added to the article. As for other towers listed, some could be reviewed for notability by height and purpose, particularly within nation or region. Dl2000 14:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CHCH Television Tower per D12000. No vote on the rest, as there is no easy way to go through so many articles at once to determine what should be kept and what not. This AfD should have been broken into smaller chunks, as DRV has a history of overturning such mass nominations. Resolute 16:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CHCH Television Tower per D12000, but no vote on the rest of them. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 17:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The CHCH Television Tower was not only the tallest structure in Canada at the time of its completion, but it's still in the Top 5. If that isn't sufficiently notable, I don't know what could be. Unconditional keep on that one. As for the others, since a "no vote" doesn't get factored in against delete or keep votes, put me down for the following: temporary keep all, kill the batch job, and renominate individually so each can be considered on its own merits. Bearcat 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CHCH Television Tower and Delete the rest. Vegaswikian 01:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated in the nomination, I had not intended on deletion of non-US masts at this point. Furthermore, the article has been dramatically improved by User:Dl2000 since nomination. I withdraw CHCH Tower from above. Ohconfucius 04:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.