Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KAGI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. SK1 (withdrawn), no other deletes. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KAGI[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references Greatder (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Greatder (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I haven't evaluated them, but there are some refs in the section labeled "External links". You can also tag such articles with {{no footnotes}}. —siro χ o 10:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jefferson Public Radio. This station is just a rebroadcaster of that network and originates no programming. Flip Format (talk) 17:54, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jefferson Public Radio for now. Granted, I do think this would be an {{R with possibilities}}; I'd think that a station that has been around since ~1940, and (as far as I can find) has only been part of a public radio network since 1991, should potentially have more sourceable content and potential notability (which is not temporary, of course). As it stands, though, this is another one of those stubs written in 2011 (replacing a preexisting redirect to Jefferson Public Radio) when our (over)presumption of notability in this topic area was still so overly broad that we were creating stubs on seemingly every transmitter of the public radio networks, even if they have never had any separate on-air content (and that was largely curtailed even before GNG enforcement was stepped up in 2021). If this were created as-is today, it would probably be redirected within days or even hours, without the need for AfD. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Pivoting to at least a weak keep; if nothing else, the entire rationale for the nomination (which was the lack of references) appears to have been rectified with Sammi Brie's rewrite/expansion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I just did a full rewrite. The main problem is newspaper availability. It may say something that I don't have a radio DYK from the Medford market—though this would qualify. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent recovery! I would definitely vote Keep now! Greatder (talk) 18:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Thanks to Sammi Brie (talk · contribs · count) for the additional references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sammi Brie's excellent WP:HEY —siro χ o 00:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Striking my Redirect !vote. Flip Format (talk) 20:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.