Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Annamalai (I.P.S)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

K. Annamalai (I.P.S)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

K. Annamalai (I.P.S) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a random IPS Officer among thousands and thousands, who left his job to join a political party as a basic low level party worker. Fails WP:NPOL and doesn't even come closer to WP:BLP1E.

The present article is a copy of a previously hijacked article of K. Annamalai who is a Member of the legislative assembly, during the start of this year [1], till a user reverted it back to its previous revision before the hijack here. The present unverified image in the article also seems like a screenshot from a youtube video which could be also violate the copyright policy.

This subject is not notable in any way to have an article on Wikipedia and the article is written like a promotion of his biography. The older versions form the hijacked page even had highly promotional content with no citations here which highly suspects of WP:PAID editng and WP:COI. I suggest to delete the article for now and wait till anything develops reason being wikipedia is not a soapbox and biographical host for every person. Thank you, King of Victory (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. King of Victory (talk) 09:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. King of Victory (talk) 09:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

• Delete as the nominator King of Victory (talk) 09:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. King of Victory (talk) 09:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. King of Victory (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. King of Victory (talk) 10:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. King of Victory (talk) 10:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

• Delete As per nom. Priyanjali singh (talk) 13:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nom Ab207 (talk) 14:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Non-notable civil servant and in general only super high-level political staffers tend to be notable. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
• Keep He seems to be notable civil servant with good following from coastal districts in Karnataka. Various newspaper and media articles highlight his honest service to Indian police. It is worth noting that his transfer during service invoked protests from common citizens who referred as Singham of Karnataka.. "Singam/Singham" is recent epiphet (after 2010 blockbuster Hindi movie Singham) in India to indicate a honest police officer. Within a week of joining a political party, he was appointed as vice-president of TN BJP unit. It is advised to contribute to this article as per wikipedia norms. Bsskchaitanya (talk) 16:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

References

• Apart from saying he's "singham" and "joined BJP", there's nothing substantive, we need something other than this to establish notability per WP:BLP1E. --Ab207 (talk) 21:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.