Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-T Line
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD G5. Created by a sock puppet of a sock puppet of an indefinitely blocked editor. (now there's a mouthful) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
K-T Line[edit]
- K-T Line (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page does not disambiguate anything. Rather, it is now serving as a way for the page creator, Inetpuppy, to add his favorite line into articlespace, the very same line that I deleted multiple times from the K Ingleside and T Third Street articles because it merely restated what was already said in less coherent language. Kurykh (talk) 05:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's note: For some background, see here, here, and here. I also have a lingering suspicion that User:Inetpuppy is a reincarnation of User:Inetpup (for obvious reasons), who did the same thing a few years ago and was indefblocked as a sockpuppet. --Kurykh (talk) 06:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it is an interesting coincidence that the K-T Line is very similar in terminology to the K-T boundary. I know, I realize I need a news source that says this! Nonetheless, I thought it was worth a try.
- And yes, obviously I am a reincarnation of the former. The sockpuppet finding is not notable, because my roommate shares my Internet connection, and I was the one to convince him to take an interest in Wikipedia in the first place (as a vehicle to learn English). The CU admin overstepped his boundaries by going fishing, after my roommate and I (with whom I also happen to share left-leaning political beliefs, among other things), decided to successively insert humor into the Sarah Palin article. After a wikibreak, both of us created new accounts and resumed editing. However, I observed a problem about one year ago. My roommate was having recurring conflicts with other editors and he continued making unproductive edits. So, I reconfigured my router to disallow his editing Wikipedia from his MAC address, until such time that his English is comprehensible to others. --Inetpuppy (talk) 06:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Inetpuppy has been BLOCKED indefinitely by Checkuser following this confession. Nuff said~! --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 07:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And yes, obviously I am a reincarnation of the former. The sockpuppet finding is not notable, because my roommate shares my Internet connection, and I was the one to convince him to take an interest in Wikipedia in the first place (as a vehicle to learn English). The CU admin overstepped his boundaries by going fishing, after my roommate and I (with whom I also happen to share left-leaning political beliefs, among other things), decided to successively insert humor into the Sarah Palin article. After a wikibreak, both of us created new accounts and resumed editing. However, I observed a problem about one year ago. My roommate was having recurring conflicts with other editors and he continued making unproductive edits. So, I reconfigured my router to disallow his editing Wikipedia from his MAC address, until such time that his English is comprehensible to others. --Inetpuppy (talk) 06:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.