Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Köld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep (withdrawn by nominator) (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 22:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Köld[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album, can't find any significant coverage or evidence that it charted in a WP:BEFORE search. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:GNG. I've added several sources to the article from the Icelandic media. Alvaldi (talk) 18:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. This album passes notability guidelines easily, due to its association with Spinefarm Records (via Spikefarm). The article was miniature at the beginning of this discussion, and I will say that its size was an issue. But what the article needs most is an expansion, and I know there should be verifiable information available on this album in and of itself, including reviews by established media; we just need to look in the right places, and apply them to the article. It would be unfortunate for a reductivist approach to affect this article, when such a measure is not necessary. (note: I found a page that I would like to add as a citation for the article.)

One thing I will say is that albums should not be automatically disqualified for entry on Wikipedia due to an absence of chart appearances, especially since the other concern posed is currently being addressed. Also, I appreciate @Alvaldi for expanding the article since the discussion started. It's a good start, but the article has a ways to go yet. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mungo Kitsch: didn't mean to imply that I thought that albums need to be chart to be notable - they certainly don't. Alvaldi thanks for your additions - I'll withdraw this nomination. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.