Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jwalantham (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jwalantham[edit]

Jwalantham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, no significant coverage from independent reliable sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 01:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 01:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:11, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Couldn't find indepth coverage; even the sources in the article don't seem to actually be about the movie. --GRuban (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NFILM and lack of WP:SIGCOV. The only passing mentions in mainstream newspapers are kind of promotional in nature.--DBigXray 21:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.