Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juxtaposition Arts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article's been up 3 weeks and quite honestly I think the next !vote would be a keep so no point dragging it on, Overall consensus is to keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Juxtaposition Arts[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an interesting one because there's quit e a bit of coverage suggesting it is quite well known own locally and may be locally notable, my best searches were here, here, here, here. Pinging Meatsgains and author SusanLesch. SwisterTwister talk 18:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Thanks for the heads up. DeAnnna Cummings is very well known. If I remember right, JUXTA is related to Intermedia Arts. Perhaps the two can be combined. I'm sorry I am not familiar with the subject and so cannot volunteer to expand the article. -SusanLesch (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 08:26, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -The article needs more reliable sources but some can be found here and here. . This organization has received more than just passing mention in many of these sources. ABF99 (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.