Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justus (musician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nothing presented convinces me this subject merits inclusion. Passing mention or PR-y type announcements don't meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG..

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Justus (musician)[edit]

Justus (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails W:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. He was Dr. Dre's "latest project" in 2015. Since then, ... Clarityfiend (talk) 06:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • All introducing Dr. Dre's new protege, all but one dated January 2015 (the renegade is from September 2015). Clarityfiend (talk) 00:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You've obviously missed the one from October 2020... GiantSnowman 09:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yes, the one titled "JUSTUS: The White Dr. Dre Protege You've Never Heard Of". Doesn't exactly scream notability, does it? Clarityfiend (talk) 12:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources are promotional announcements and public relations fkuff. They are not descriptions of musical projects that are completed. The guy had a brief moment of media hype but has not produced anything worthy of notice. No music releases. Fails WP:MUSICBIO for sure, and WP:GNG is stretched very thin with these insubstantial source articles talking about future work that never panned out. Binksternet (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The coverage is nothing but PR hype. Nothing substantive to warrant a BLP. --Kinu t/c 19:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.