Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justincase (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Everymorning talk 18:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Justincase (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Unotable album that has been long discussed as a merge it seems since 2012 (gee really that long?) Wgolf (talk) 20:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

Comment. No, it hasn't been discussed as a merge because someone just slapped a mergeto tag on it and didn't bother to start a merge discussion. You say it isn't notable (I presume that's what you mean by 'unotable') but what have you done to check whether any notability exists? --Michig (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Did you for instance do a Google search and find this article from Billboard, this review from CMJ New Music Report, and this Allmusic review? Whether or not you found these, or looked even, why did you not consider merging it rather than bringing it to AfD to get it deleted given that a merge was (half-)proposed and hasn't been opposed? --Michig (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-it says on the top it has been discussed as a merge since 2012, so I figured I mention something. Wgolf (talk) 22:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The band clears notability so their albums should clear notability as well, but the length of both articles is small enough that merging them together is easily accomplished. I don't see a need for a delete but a proper merger discussion and proposal should happen since I think that would be the best solution. Bryce Carmony (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Justincase. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per the review sources brought up by Michig. Both the album article and band article may be small, but that doesn't mean they can't be expanded. Kokoro20 (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The sources above demonstrate that the subject meets the general notability guideline. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - the Billboard, CMJ, and Allmusic pieces contain enough material to suggest potential for a sourced standalone article. I'm not opposed to a merge, either. Gongshow talk 08:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sourcing identified above as well as the following: [1] [2] Everymorning talk 17:34, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn-I do find it odd it says merge to on top so I was not sure what to say. Anyway withdrawing. Wgolf (talk) 18:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.