Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Stuart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Stuart[edit]

Justin Stuart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A unremarkable YouTube personality who is not independently notable of his YouTube channel (JStuStudios). The article does not establish independent notability, and should be deleted. I've nominated the channel separately; pls see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JStuStudios.

I am also nominating the following related page because both come across as being part of a walled garden around JStuStudios. The two articles were created in the same timeframe as JStuStudios and by the same contributor. Both follow the same format and fail to demonstrate independent notability, hence I believe it's appropriate to bundle them:

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I searched for sources on both Scites and Stuart and didn't come up with much. Redirect to JStuStudios (if that is notable to stay - didn't check! might not) + mention there. Definitely TOOSOON.Icewhiz (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. no independent refs of note. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Mjbmr (talk) 06:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both as per nom. Searches did not turn up enough independent sourcing to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 21:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.