Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bowers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Bowers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to have sources that meet WP:GNG per WP:ROUTINE and does not meet any requirements of WP:NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 13:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 15:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't get it, really. A hallmark of the several hundred Dolovis-created articles that have gone through the deletion process (for which he received, in the end, a community ban from new article creation) was to conflate petty "honors" into the major honors required by NHOCKEY for presumptive notability. But here we fall short: a fellow with an ephemeral career in the mid- to low-minor leagues, he has no league honors of any sort, not even from his admittedly good 2010 season in the low minors, not even a specious claim. Nothing. There's never been any iteration of NHOCKEY under which the subject qualifies, and certainly won't now. Ravenswing 18:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per WP:NHOCKEY/LA, the American Hockey League (the highest level at which he played) can get a player into Wikipedia under criterion #3 ("Played at least 200 games (90 games for a goaltender) or achieved preeminent honors (all-time top ten career scorer, First Team All-Star) in top-level minor leagues or second tier national leagues") — it is not a league for which every player automatically gets an article just for playing in it, and this article does not show evidence that Bowers actually meets the necessary conditions to qualify. Bearcat (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per everyone above - fails NHOCKEY. Fyddlestix (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.