Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Surrender

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just Surrender[edit]

Fails to meet criteria for a music article, band has no notable members and are unsigned Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 03:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - they sound good, but no independent sources found --T-rex 03:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- change to Keep - based on sources found by User:Paul Erik --T-rex 14:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I found a few independent sources and added them to the article: The Monitor, the Evening Chronicle, AbsolutePunk.net, and Wonka Vision all reviewed this band's albums. I think it's enough to establish notability under criterion #1 of WP:MUSIC. Keep. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Band meets WP:MUSIC points 1 and 5. The nominator's rationale is poor; the band was signed to EastWest Records subsidiary Broken English for two full-length albums and only recently self-released their latest, and their having no notable members is moot; many notable bands don't, particularly when they are relatively new. Chubbles (talk) 13:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.