Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Donal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 19:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just Donal[edit]

Blog/website for which I have not been able to find much reference — but maybe someone else will know better ? Already tagged {{context}}, orphan. Schutz 14:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the article has been blanked because of copyright problems; please see the page's history (in particular this version) for the version relevant to this AfD discussion. Schutz 16:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — nn website. Feezo (Talk) 14:11, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable website, per WP:WEB--Blue520 15:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as copyvio, lifted perfectly off http://www.aboutjustdonal.blogspot.com/ , look at the article and you can even see the copyright notice. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 15:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I have blanked the page, and added a copyvio message. However, since we already have a discussion here, I have not refered the page to Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Schutz 15:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note, however, that the article does not meet the conditions for speedy deletion per CSD A8 (the content does not come from a commercial provider, and the material has been uploaded more than 48 hours ago). Schutz 16:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: The copyright Issue, Iwrote the article and you have my full permission to use it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.165.182.135 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 20 March 2006

Thank you for your comment — at the moment, this is a side issue, since we are debating if the topic itself is worth an article in an encyclopedia. However, if you wrote this article and agree for other people to use it, you should mention this on the web page itself, and indicate which licence describe your permission, or which conditions are attached to the use of the text (no condition ? GFDL ? Creative Commons ? So far, the only thing we can know about you is your IP address, and this is not enough to actually link you with the article. Best, Schutz 17:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable website; it's a safe bet that almost anything hosted on Blogspot fails WP:WEB. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.