Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juris Graubergers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juris Graubergers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

paid for pr spam - the MTV it stuff is actually ugen and even if it weren't, it's not coverage (see the history at Urbanstep). As of yet non-notable DJ with no meaningful coverage and has only received a nomination for an award. CUPIDICAE💕 20:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Latvia. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:ADMASQ fails WP:GNG Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I strongly believe the artist meets the criteria (WP:MUSIC),

1. He has been featured on Forbes Magazine (30 Under 30)
2. Nominated for a national award.
3. The MTV PR was used to source his album.

~~4. He was a production crew for Eurovision 2021 - Latvia~~

Platznium1 (talk) 00:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)--sock strike CUPIDICAE💕 17:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of what is said above is a part of WP:MUSIC. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Statement How doesn't the artist meets none of the criteria in WP:MUSIC? The artist is featured on a major publication "Forbes" Secondly, nominated for a major national music event "Annual Latvian Music Recording Awards and was invited to Eurovision 2021. WP:MN states may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria.Plus the sources are verifiable by reliable sources (Press Releases). I've digged more about Juris, I've confirmed that he has charted #1 in iTunes previously too. Final: The artist is a notable subject for Wikipedia. Platznium1 (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)--sock strike. CUPIDICAE💕 17:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Forbes is not a RS if the article is credited to "Contributor." Those are the equivalent of blog posts. The link does not take one to the article to verify. ShelbyMarion (talk) 21:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Not an article. The DJ was featured on Forbes 30 Under 30. Platznium1 (talk) 01:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The artist looks notable enough (UNDER WP:MBIO). As per the author, some sources can be verified by reliable sources. I've researched about Award nomination and Forbes 30 Under 30 Feature, the sources seems true and are verifiable. Pretty much a notable subject {WP:MN} for Wikipedia. Zapfrommars (talk) 10:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)--sock strike. CUPIDICAE💕 17:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @User:Praxidicae @[User:Timtrent]], Sorry for the ping, but, could you guys please mention the articles which seems like "spam pr"? I'd try to improve the article to avoid it from AfD. Also, The articles cited are completely different plus It doesn't seem like a paid spam pr release to me. At least if it was, there would be multiple publications with same content on Google, but didn't find anything similar. Shouldn't have placed a deletion for WP:ADMASQ. Can you please research again quickly? I know you guys are super busy administring other collaborative projects, but please do another research. Thanks. Platznium1 (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)--sock strike CUPIDICAE💕 17:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Keep per the significant coverage and notability. Meets WP:MBIO. Plus, Updated the page according to NPOVNot chickenNugget (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)--sock strike. CUPIDICAE💕 17:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Praxidicae. Additionally, the fact that 2 brand-new editors immediately came to this page to vote to keep does give me some concerns of either canvassing or sockpuppetry. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.