Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junkyard Dog (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing does not exist to build an article. Should someone want this for draft space work, just ping me. Star Mississippi 14:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Junkyard Dog (film)[edit]

Junkyard Dog (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP: NFSOURCES; found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 18:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I was optimistic when I found a review by HorrorNews.net, which is usable as a RS, but other than some brief mentions I'm not finding much else. I found an article on Shockya, but I'm not really comfortable keeping an article based on this. I'm going to hold off on arguing either way, in hopes that someone can find more coverage. You'd think that a film with Dourif would have gotten a bit more coverage from the horror outlets. He puts out a lot of stuff, but he's still a king of horror. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 19:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Its got Brad Dourif and Vivica Fox in it!... however, doesn't seem to be much RS establashing it as of note. Tricky. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.