Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juned Patel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedied as WP:G5 of Sadupatel (talk · contribs) Cabayi (talk) 06:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Juned Patel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any reliable, independent coverage. Fails WP:GNG and looks like he fails WP:NPOL. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per no, fails clearly WP:GNG and WP:NPOL CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A non notable local politician who fails NPOL as well as GNG. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 23:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete almost appears as a vanity page, nothing showing he's been elected or does anything more than office work. Oaktree b (talk) 16:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment User:JunedPatelinc/sandbox = User:TechinfoInc/sandbox = Juned Patel = Draft:Juned Patel. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TechinfoInc. Cabayi (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We must watch this for socks that may try and manipulate the results. aeschyIus (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:ARTSPAM promoting a non notable member of a political youth organization. As mentioned, lacks coverage to meet inclusion criteria11:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. The "social media department" of a political party's youth committee is not a notable political office per WP:NPOL — and I still don't know why Indian editors seem so uniquely prone to thinking this kind of job would get a person into Wikipedia — and the article is not reliably sourced even remotely close to well enough to get him over WP:GNG. Delete the drafts too. Bearcat (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bearcat Also delete User:TechinfoInc/sandbox. aeschyIus (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I intended, yes. Even if they're not in draftspace, user sandboxes still count as "drafts" when I say something like "delete all the drafts too". Bearcat (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible G5 by Sadupatel. Otherwise, Delete, clearly not notable. aeschyIus (talk) 23:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.