Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Maske

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Julius Maske[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No effective sources. scope_creep^Talk 13:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia needs an end to unsourced content.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- "It's unsourced" is not an argument for deletion. With the exception of BLPs, sources do not have to be in an article for the article to be retained. They only have to exist. JPL, I've seen you doing this a lot; please stop making non-policy-based deletion arguments that indicate you - a very long-term editor - do not know or do not care about Wikipedia policy. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced page, and didn't find much else on Google except this other Wikipedia page "Maske Gruppen". Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: please don't provide general edit summaries like "cleanup" and "copyedit" when it really should have said "removal of unsourced material" etc. Removal of paragraphs is in no way "copyediting". Furthermore, the unreferenced text can stay there for the remainder of this AFD, since it will be deleted anyway if the debate goes toward delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources, no real claim to notability. This would do better on its native language Wikipedia, where it might even meet GNG. jp×g 12:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This original company is mentioned here but in the context of the merged Maske Gruppen company. I am not seeing evidence of specific notability. AllyD (talk) 18:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.