Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet Willow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (procedural close). Peridon (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Juliet Willow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG. No reliable sources. No independent coverage. Just blogging following a shock-jock radio show appearance where she claimed to be a deaf porn actress/stripper. Conspicuous BLP problems, text verges on being an attack page, and if it wasn't obviously a stage name/persona I'd speedy it. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom. BLPs aren't to be messed with. Puchiko (Talk-email) 18:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vague, lacking info and non-encyclopaedic. Possible BLP problems. Why can't it be speedied? One presumes it's a real person no matter what they're called, and not a fictional one. Non-notable whichever way. Peridon (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have deleted it under the G10 criteria for deletion. It may be sprinkled with a little IAR, but the only reference listed was to a q&a post and it was rife with BLP-violating material. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.