Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julien Bertheau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Julien Bertheau[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article provides no proof of notability or any references, it just says that the person is an actor. As it stands, it fails WP:N. TonyStarks (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and recommend closure You're wrong. A notable article will always be notable, regardless of whether it is a one liner. Bertheau actually happens to be one of the biggest and most prolific French stage actors of the 20th century and you'll find masses of sources in google books. He also had many leading roles in films opposite actresses like Sophia Loren and under directors like Jean Renoir. You are missing the point of why the editor started it; the content is there in French initially which can be accessed in English. Always google book search a subject before nominating and then make a decision on notability, don't confuse lack of content with lack of notability! This article is genuinely one of those wikipedia should be kicking itself it was missing, I'd rate it high importance for WP:Actors.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep An actor with a long and distinguished career, memorably in Bunuel's late films such as Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. AllyD (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, especially in its current state. Definitely notable and necessary. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and close per Dr. Blofeld. He clearly passes our guideline for actors. Cavarrone (talk) 05:54, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject clearly meets our notability criteria, particularly WP:ACTOR, though that was not at all obvious from the article as it was when nominated. Good work, that. I'd speedy close it, but there's only a day left anyway. Best to put it to bed. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.