Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Shea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 17:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Shea[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Believes she fails WP:NTRACK Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, subject meets #7 of WP:NTRACK, please see this source:
Shea set the national high school girls mile record in 1977 with a 4:43.1 when she was a senior at Cardinal Gibbons High.
Furthermore, the subject made a historic first being the first woman to win the ACC Athlete of the Year award, and thus can be said to pass WP:ANYBIO, the subject was also given in-depth coverage from her Alma Mater. That being said the subject has received multiple mentions in non-primary reliable sources including the New York Times, and added up it can be argued that those multiple mentions would be considered significant coverage.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 15:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KeepSeems to have passed notability SYSS Mouse (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article may be lacking, but subject is notable. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject definitely notable, confirmed by sources located by RightCowLeftCoast. Finnegas (talk) 13:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.