Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Gold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Gold[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His work as a doctor does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:PROF. His position as "Vice-Mayor of Beverly Hills" does not meet WP:POLITICIAN and fails WP:POLOUTCOMES. The only discussion about him in other reliable sources, that I could find, concerns his re-run for Vice-Mayor. As such, he does not meet the WP:GNG. Additionally, most of his biographical info is un-cited and the overall tone of the article smacks of being a vanity piece. Bellerophon _{talk to me} 22:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete vanity piece. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. Fails GNG. -- Calidum 05:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear to meet any specific notability criteria or WP:GNG. Jakejr (talk) 18:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – simply another !vote favoring deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 05:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others; fails WP:GNG. APerson (talk!) 19:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I removed much of the vanityspamcruft. Passes barely. Bearian (talk) 06:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.