Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Dobrowolski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per BLP concerns. MaxSem 13:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Dobrowolski[edit]

Completely unreferenced article about seemingly not notable person. No article on Polish Wikipedia, almost no google hits. Previously speedily deleted as "likely hoax" and recreated by User:Matti1003. Jogers (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability found. Appears to be a hoax. --Finngall ^talk 21:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm finding nothing on a Julian Dobrowolski on Google outside of a 20-year-old Warhammer player and a middle-aged murder victim. Does not appear to pass WP:NOTE; article is also not attributed. --Charlene 21:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletions. -- Jogers (talk) 22:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as nonsense and probable hoax. "Julian Dobrowolski" and "jewish" or "pimp" in any combination yields exactly zero ghits. "Julian Dobrowolski" alone yields 57, but none about the person the article purports to describe. Ford MF 23:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Additionally, the article creator added "Julian Dobrowolski" to 1987 (Diff) as a "Jewish rights advocate". The whole thing reeks of bad-faith create. Ford MF 23:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above arguments.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 00:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G10 (assuming it's a real person; otherwise it should be deleted anyway). PrimeHunter 00:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have stubbed it per WP:BLP. [1] This could be all made up about a real person. PrimeHunter 01:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment The creator restored it. I have stubbed it again and tagged for speedy deletion. It's time an administrator looks at this. PrimeHunter 13:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom; probably hoax. —Visor (talk · contribs) 09:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.