Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian (actor) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 10:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Julian (actor)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete :: see Talk:Julian (actor). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gene93k and AlanE119: See here. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability issues not changed since previous AfD discussion. Still fails WP:BASIC without significant coverage by independent reliable secondary sources. References are interviews, repackaged press releases and a trivial mention or two. Still fails WP:PORNBIO with only a scene-related award win. As for the contested speedy, reliable secondary sources need to support the claim this person is a "major player" in the industry, and porn nominations no longer count towards notability per WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 12:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amended comment: Now that PORNBIO has just be deprecated, it should also be stated that any potential claims of passing WP:ANYBIO or WP:ENT are not supported by independent reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:BASIC / WP:ENT. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as does not have significant coverage in non-niche reliable sources and also has not won a major award as scene related awards are considered to be of a lower standard Atlantic306 (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails the Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.