Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bond

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Bond[edit]

Julia Bond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and Gng. Appearing on Jerry springer and a bit part do not make you notable. blps should have better sourcing then this. Spartaz Humbug! 09:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Bit-part mainstream appearances don't satisfy PORNBIO. Lacks non-trivial independent RS coverage to satisfy GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unfortunately fails PORNBIO. –Davey2010Talk 19:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.