Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juiceroof

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Juiceroof[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. I tried to engage with the editor via the talk page but didn't get a reaction. Does not appear to meet Wikipedia:Notability (music). Schwede 66 05:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seven news results, five of which are press releases, one of which is a false positive, and one of which is this story from a local paper which mentions the group once in passing. Maybe one day, but not today. TimothyJosephWood 17:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.