Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Ann Pachciarz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 01:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Ann Pachciarz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure this meets WP:ACADEMIC or other relevant notability guidelines. It appears it was created by a SPA. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found a whole book about her: Verheyden-Hilliard, M. E. (1988). Scientist and Physician, Judith Pachciarz. United States: Equity Institute. There's a biography here: https://cfmedicine.nlm.nih.gov/physicians/biography_244.html 11 pages about her here: https://www.lifescitrc.org/download.cfm?submissionID=3607 CT55555 (talk) 02:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article as nominated already had two highly reliable and in-depth sources and the additional book makes WP:GNG notability even clearer. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Perhaps the nominator was only looking at NPROF and not GNG? JoelleJay (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep notability is solidly proven Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, not a SPA - this is just my first Wikipedia entry. Rathernuts (talk) 23:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.