Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judeopolonia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Judeopolonia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable conspiracy theory that has very little coverage in WP:RS.

The only sources cited are themselves fringe or only barely mention the theory itself.

The entire article is very vulnerable to anti-semitism and fringe editing. Coverage in very few sources or of antisemitism in Poland is not enough to say that this specific theory is notable. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 15:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 15:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 15:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 15:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 15:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep We'd been discussing this at WP:FRINGE/N and it is possible that this article is a notable conspiracy theory. But in keeping with the tenets of WP:FRINGE we need to make sure the article is a description of a notable conspiracy theory rather than expressing it as if it were part of mainstream dialog. Simonm223 (talk) 16:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Does appear to have enough sourcing to meet WP:GNG as a notable conspiracy theory, but I hope a few folks will keep it on their watchlist to make sure the conspiracy theory description stays in. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oh it's on mine now. And I'll probably add it to WP:NONAZIS on the list of at-risk pages. Simonm223 (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Unfortunately, this is a notable conspiracy theory (note alt. spelling of Judeo-Polonia). See for instance: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Icewhiz (talk) 17:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Agree with Simonm223. Mccapra (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per coverage.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good points above. The subject is of historic interest and the recent revival of the idea shows the notability of this topic. --mikeu ^talk 21:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of Polish language sources, and academic sources, referring to this term (and related terms). This article could be materially developed. Britishfinance (talk) 00:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.