Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude Feranmi Kolawole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:37, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jude Feranmi Kolawole[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NPOL / WP:ANYBIO; significant RS coverage not found. Created by Special:Contributions/Enioladaniel with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being the founder and CEO of an organization is not an automatic Wikipedia inclusion freebie in and of itself — it can get a person into Wikipedia if they can be shown to have received enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG for it, but it does not guarantee a Wikipedia article to everybody who ever founded or led an organization. But the references here are not reliable source coverage about him for the purposes of invoking GNG — there's a mix of primary sources, glancing namechecks of his existence in media coverage that isn't about him, Q&A interviews in which he's speaking about himself rather than being discussed or analyzed in the third person, and inherently unreliable blogs. None of this is enough. Bearcat (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.